{"id":4015,"date":"2024-05-16T13:03:42","date_gmt":"2024-05-16T13:03:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tttp-au.com\/?page_id=4015"},"modified":"2025-01-16T07:31:03","modified_gmt":"2025-01-16T07:31:03","slug":"publication-ethics","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/tttp-au.com\/index.php\/publication-ethics\/","title":{"rendered":"Publication ethics"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

PUBLICATION ETHICS<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Publication ethics, disclosure policy and malpractice statement <\/em><\/strong><\/p>

Publication and authorship<\/em><\/p>

  • All submitted articles are subject to strict peer-review process by at least two reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular paper.<\/li>
  • The factors that are taken into account in review are relevance, soundness, significance, originality, readability and language, copyright infringement and plagiarism.<\/li>
  • For published articles, information on relevant potential conflicts of interest will be made available to the public.<\/li><\/ul>

    \u00a0<\/em><\/p>

    Authors’ responsibilities<\/em><\/p>

    • Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work, has not previously been published elsewhere, and the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.<\/li>
    • Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript.<\/li>
    • Authors wishing to include figures, tables or other materials that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright holder(s). Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.<\/li><\/ul>

      Reviewers’ responsibilities<\/em><\/p>

      • Reviewers are required to provide written, competent and unbiased feedback in a timely manner on the scholarly merits and the scientific value of the manuscript.<\/li>
      • Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author.\u00a0<\/li>
      • Reviewers must not have conflict of interest with respect to the research, the authors and\/or the funding sources for the research. If such conflicts exist, the reviewers must report them to the Editor without delay.<\/li>
      • Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor without delay.<\/li>
      • Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. reviewers must not use unpublished materials disclosed in submitted manuscripts without the express written consent of the authors. The information and ideas presented in submitted manuscripts shall be kept confidential and must not be used for personal gain.<\/li><\/ul>

        Editors’ responsibilities<\/em><\/p>

        • Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject\/accept an article.<\/li>
        • Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication.<\/li>
        • Editors should always consider the needs of the authors and the readers when attempting to improve the publication.<\/li>
        • Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem.<\/li><\/ul>

          Peer Review Process<\/strong><\/p>

          Based on the reviews, editorial board decides on paper publishing and informs the author within 3 months from paper receipt. Papers should be prepared in accordance with the Instructions for Authors for TTTP.<\/p>

          Reviews and publishing. All papers are anonymously reviewed by two anonymous reviewers. On the basis of reviews, editorial staff makes decision on paper publishing and informs the author about it within three months from paper receipt.<\/p><\/div>

          \u00a0<\/div>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
          \n\t\t\t\t
          \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

          OPEN ACCESS POLICY<\/strong><\/h3>

          In accordance with definition of open access, all content is freely available without charge to the user. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. Traffic and Transport Theory and Practice (TTTP) Journal\u00a0applies the CC BY license.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t

          \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
          \n\t\t\t\t\t
          \n\t\t\t
          \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
          \n\t\t\t\t
          \n\t\t\t\t\t

          PUBLICATION ETHICS<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
          \n\t\t\t\t
          \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
          \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
          \n\t\t\t\t
          \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

          Publication ethics, disclosure policy and malpractice statement <\/em><\/strong><\/p>

          \u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/p>

          Publication and authorship<\/em><\/p>

          • All submitted articles are subject to strict peer-review process by at least two reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular paper.<\/li>
          • The factors that are taken into account in review are relevance, soundness, significance, originality, readability and language, copyright infringement and plagiarism.<\/li>
          • For published articles, information on relevant potential conflicts of interest will be made available to the public.<\/li><\/ul>

            \u00a0<\/em><\/p>

            Authors’ responsibilities<\/em><\/p>

            • Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work, has not previously been published elsewhere, and the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.<\/li>
            • Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript.<\/li>
            • Authors wishing to include figures, tables or other materials that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright holder(s). Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.<\/li><\/ul>

              Reviewers’ responsibilities<\/em><\/p>

              • Reviewers are required to provide written, competent and unbiased feedback in a timely manner on the scholarly merits and the scientific value of the manuscript.<\/li>
              • Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author.\u00a0<\/li>
              • Reviewers must not have conflict of interest with respect to the research, the authors and\/or the funding sources for the research. If such conflicts exist, the reviewers must report them to the Editor without delay.<\/li>
              • Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor without delay.<\/li>
              • Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. reviewers must not use unpublished materials disclosed in submitted manuscripts without the express written consent of the authors. The information and ideas presented in submitted manuscripts shall be kept confidential and must not be used for personal gain.<\/li><\/ul>

                Editors’ responsibilities<\/em><\/p>

                • Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject\/accept an article.<\/li>
                • Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication.<\/li>
                • Editors should always consider the needs of the authors and the readers when attempting to improve the publication.<\/li>
                • Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem.<\/li><\/ul>
                  \u00a0<\/div>

                  Peer Review Process<\/strong><\/p>

                  Based on the reviews, editorial board decides on paper publishing and informs the author within 3 months from paper receipt. Papers should be prepared in accordance with the Instructions for Authors for TTTP.<\/p>

                  Reviews and publishing. All papers are anonymously reviewed by two anonymous reviewers. On the basis of reviews, editorial staff makes decision on paper publishing and informs the author about it within three months from paper receipt.<\/p><\/div>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

                  \n\t\t\t\t
                  \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

                  OPEN ACCESS POLICY<\/strong><\/h3>

                  In accordance with definition of open access, all content is freely available without charge to the user. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. Traffic and Transport Theory and Practice (TTTP) Journal\u00a0applies the CC BY license.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t

                  \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
                  \n\t\t\t\t\t
                  \n\t\t\t
                  \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
                  \n\t\t\t\t
                  \n\t\t\t\t\t

                  PUBLICATION ETHICS<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
                  \n\t\t\t\t
                  \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                  \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
                  \n\t\t\t\t
                  \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

                  Publication ethics, disclosure policy and malpractice statement <\/em><\/strong><\/p>

                  \u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/p>

                  Publication and authorship<\/em><\/p>

                  • All submitted articles are subject to strict peer-review process by at least two reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular paper.<\/li>
                  • The factors that are taken into account in review are relevance, soundness, significance, originality, readability and language, copyright infringement and plagiarism.<\/li>
                  • For published articles, information on relevant potential conflicts of interest will be made available to the public.<\/li><\/ul>

                    \u00a0<\/em><\/p>

                    Authors’ responsibilities<\/em><\/p>

                    • Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work, has not previously been published elsewhere, and the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.<\/li>
                    • Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript.<\/li>
                    • Authors wishing to include figures, tables or other materials that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright holder(s). Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.<\/li><\/ul>

                      \u00a0<\/em><\/p>

                      Reviewers’ responsibilities<\/em><\/p>

                      • Reviewers are required to provide written, competent and unbiased feedback in a timely manner on the scholarly merits and the scientific value of the manuscript.<\/li>
                      • Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author.\u00a0<\/li>
                      • Reviewers must not have conflict of interest with respect to the research, the authors and\/or the funding sources for the research. If such conflicts exist, the reviewers must report them to the Editor without delay.<\/li>
                      • Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor without delay.<\/li>
                      • Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. reviewers must not use unpublished materials disclosed in submitted manuscripts without the express written consent of the authors. The information and ideas presented in submitted manuscripts shall be kept confidential and must not be used for personal gain.<\/li><\/ul>

                        \u00a0<\/em><\/p>

                        Editors’ responsibilities<\/em><\/p>

                        • Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject\/accept an article.<\/li>
                        • Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication.<\/li>
                        • Editors should always consider the needs of the authors and the readers when attempting to improve the publication.<\/li>
                        • Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem.<\/li><\/ul>
                          \u00a0<\/div>

                          Peer Review Process<\/strong><\/p>

                          Based on the reviews, editorial board decides on paper publishing and informs the author within 3 months from paper receipt. Papers should be prepared in accordance with the Instructions for Authors for TTTP.<\/p>

                          Reviews and publishing. All papers are anonymously reviewed by two anonymous reviewers. On the basis of reviews, editorial staff makes decision on paper publishing and informs the author about it within three months from paper receipt.<\/p><\/div>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

                          \n\t\t\t\t
                          \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

                          OPEN ACCESS POLICY<\/strong><\/h3>

                          In accordance with definition of open access, all content is freely available without charge to the user. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. Traffic and Transport Theory and Practice (TTTP) Journal\u00a0applies the CC BY license.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                          PUBLICATION ETHICS Publication ethics, disclosure policy and malpractice statement Publication and authorship All submitted articles are subject to strict peer-review process by at least two reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular paper. The factors that are taken into account in review are relevance, soundness, significance, originality, readability and language, copyright infringement and plagiarism. For published articles, information on relevant potential conflicts of interest will be made available to the public. \u00a0 Authors’ responsibilities Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work, has not previously been published elsewhere, and the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript. Authors wishing to include figures, tables or other materials that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright holder(s). Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors. Reviewers’ responsibilities Reviewers are required to provide written, competent and unbiased feedback in a timely manner on the scholarly merits and the scientific value of the manuscript. Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author.\u00a0 Reviewers must not have conflict of interest with respect to the research, the authors and\/or the funding sources for the research. If such conflicts exist, the reviewers must report them to the Editor without delay. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor without delay. Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. reviewers must not use unpublished materials disclosed in submitted manuscripts without the express written consent of the authors. The information and ideas presented in submitted manuscripts shall be kept confidential and must not be used for personal gain. Editors’ responsibilities Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject\/accept an article. Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication. Editors should always consider the needs of the authors and the readers when attempting to improve the publication. Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem. Peer Review Process Based on the reviews, editorial board decides on paper publishing and informs the author within 3 months from paper receipt. Papers should be prepared in accordance with the Instructions for Authors for TTTP. Reviews and publishing. All papers are anonymously reviewed by two anonymous reviewers. On the basis of reviews, editorial staff makes decision on paper publishing and informs the author about it within three months from paper receipt. \u00a0 OPEN ACCESS POLICY In accordance with definition of open access, all content is freely available without charge to the user. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. Traffic and Transport Theory and Practice (TTTP) Journal\u00a0applies the CC BY license. PUBLICATION ETHICS Publication ethics, disclosure policy and malpractice statement \u00a0 Publication and authorship All submitted articles are subject to strict peer-review process by at least two reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular paper. The factors that are taken into account in review are relevance, soundness, significance, originality, readability and language, copyright infringement and plagiarism. For published articles, information on relevant potential conflicts of interest will be made available to the public. \u00a0 Authors’ responsibilities Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work, has not previously been published elsewhere, and the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript. Authors wishing to include figures, tables or other materials that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright holder(s). Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors. Reviewers’ responsibilities Reviewers are required to provide written, competent and unbiased feedback in a timely manner on the scholarly merits and the scientific value of the manuscript. Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author.\u00a0 Reviewers must not have conflict of interest with respect to the research, the authors and\/or the funding sources for the research. If such conflicts exist, the reviewers must report them to the Editor without delay. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor without delay. Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. reviewers must not use unpublished materials disclosed in submitted manuscripts without the express written consent of the authors. The information and ideas presented in submitted manuscripts shall be kept confidential and must not be used for personal gain. Editors’ responsibilities Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject\/accept an article. Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication. Editors should always consider the needs of the authors and the readers when attempting to improve the publication. Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem. \u00a0 Peer Review Process Based on the reviews, editorial board decides on paper publishing and informs the author within 3 months from paper receipt. Papers should be prepared in accordance with the Instructions for Authors for TTTP. Reviews and publishing. All papers are anonymously reviewed by two anonymous reviewers. On the basis of reviews, editorial staff makes decision on paper publishing and informs the author about it within three months from paper receipt. OPEN ACCESS POLICY In accordance with definition of open access, all content is freely available without charge to the user. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search to the full texts of the articles in this journal<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"elementor_header_footer","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-4015","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"yoast_head":"\nPublication ethics - TTTP Traffic and Transport Theory and Practice Journal<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/tttp-au.com\/index.php\/publication-ethics\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Publication ethics - TTTP Traffic and Transport Theory and Practice Journal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"PUBLICATION ETHICS Publication ethics, disclosure policy and malpractice statement Publication and authorship All submitted articles are subject to strict peer-review process by at least two reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular paper. The factors that are taken into account in review are relevance, soundness, significance, originality, readability and language, copyright infringement and plagiarism. For published articles, information on relevant potential conflicts of interest will be made available to the public. \u00a0 Authors’ responsibilities Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work, has not previously been published elsewhere, and the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript. Authors wishing to include figures, tables or other materials that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright holder(s). Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors. Reviewers’ responsibilities Reviewers are required to provide written, competent and unbiased feedback in a timely manner on the scholarly merits and the scientific value of the manuscript. Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author.\u00a0 Reviewers must not have conflict of interest with respect to the research, the authors and\/or the funding sources for the research. If such conflicts exist, the reviewers must report them to the Editor without delay. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor without delay. Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. reviewers must not use unpublished materials disclosed in submitted manuscripts without the express written consent of the authors. The information and ideas presented in submitted manuscripts shall be kept confidential and must not be used for personal gain. Editors’ responsibilities Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject\/accept an article. Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication. Editors should always consider the needs of the authors and the readers when attempting to improve the publication. Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem. Peer Review Process Based on the reviews, editorial board decides on paper publishing and informs the author within 3 months from paper receipt. Papers should be prepared in accordance with the Instructions for Authors for TTTP. Reviews and publishing. All papers are anonymously reviewed by two anonymous reviewers. On the basis of reviews, editorial staff makes decision on paper publishing and informs the author about it within three months from paper receipt. \u00a0 OPEN ACCESS POLICY In accordance with definition of open access, all content is freely available without charge to the user. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. Traffic and Transport Theory and Practice (TTTP) Journal\u00a0applies the CC BY license. PUBLICATION ETHICS Publication ethics, disclosure policy and malpractice statement \u00a0 Publication and authorship All submitted articles are subject to strict peer-review process by at least two reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular paper. The factors that are taken into account in review are relevance, soundness, significance, originality, readability and language, copyright infringement and plagiarism. For published articles, information on relevant potential conflicts of interest will be made available to the public. \u00a0 Authors’ responsibilities Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work, has not previously been published elsewhere, and the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript. Authors wishing to include figures, tables or other materials that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright holder(s). Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors. Reviewers’ responsibilities Reviewers are required to provide written, competent and unbiased feedback in a timely manner on the scholarly merits and the scientific value of the manuscript. Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author.\u00a0 Reviewers must not have conflict of interest with respect to the research, the authors and\/or the funding sources for the research. If such conflicts exist, the reviewers must report them to the Editor without delay. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor without delay. Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. reviewers must not use unpublished materials disclosed in submitted manuscripts without the express written consent of the authors. The information and ideas presented in submitted manuscripts shall be kept confidential and must not be used for personal gain. Editors’ responsibilities Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject\/accept an article. Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication. Editors should always consider the needs of the authors and the readers when attempting to improve the publication. Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem. \u00a0 Peer Review Process Based on the reviews, editorial board decides on paper publishing and informs the author within 3 months from paper receipt. Papers should be prepared in accordance with the Instructions for Authors for TTTP. Reviews and publishing. All papers are anonymously reviewed by two anonymous reviewers. On the basis of reviews, editorial staff makes decision on paper publishing and informs the author about it within three months from paper receipt. OPEN ACCESS POLICY In accordance with definition of open access, all content is freely available without charge to the user. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search to the full texts of the articles in this journal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/tttp-au.com\/index.php\/publication-ethics\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"TTTP Traffic and Transport Theory and Practice Journal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-01-16T07:31:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/tttp-au.com\/index.php\/publication-ethics\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/tttp-au.com\/index.php\/publication-ethics\/\",\"name\":\"Publication ethics - TTTP Traffic and Transport Theory and Practice Journal\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/tttp-au.com\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-05-16T13:03:42+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-01-16T07:31:03+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/tttp-au.com\/index.php\/publication-ethics\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/tttp-au.com\/index.php\/publication-ethics\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/tttp-au.com\/index.php\/publication-ethics\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/tttp-au.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Publication ethics\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/tttp-au.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/tttp-au.com\/\",\"name\":\"TTTP Traffic and Transport Theory and Practice Journal\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/tttp-au.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Publication ethics - TTTP Traffic and Transport Theory and Practice Journal","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/tttp-au.com\/index.php\/publication-ethics\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Publication ethics - TTTP Traffic and Transport Theory and Practice Journal","og_description":"PUBLICATION ETHICS Publication ethics, disclosure policy and malpractice statement Publication and authorship All submitted articles are subject to strict peer-review process by at least two reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular paper. The factors that are taken into account in review are relevance, soundness, significance, originality, readability and language, copyright infringement and plagiarism. For published articles, information on relevant potential conflicts of interest will be made available to the public. \u00a0 Authors’ responsibilities Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work, has not previously been published elsewhere, and the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript. Authors wishing to include figures, tables or other materials that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright holder(s). Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors. Reviewers’ responsibilities Reviewers are required to provide written, competent and unbiased feedback in a timely manner on the scholarly merits and the scientific value of the manuscript. Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author.\u00a0 Reviewers must not have conflict of interest with respect to the research, the authors and\/or the funding sources for the research. If such conflicts exist, the reviewers must report them to the Editor without delay. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor without delay. Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. reviewers must not use unpublished materials disclosed in submitted manuscripts without the express written consent of the authors. The information and ideas presented in submitted manuscripts shall be kept confidential and must not be used for personal gain. Editors’ responsibilities Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject\/accept an article. Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication. Editors should always consider the needs of the authors and the readers when attempting to improve the publication. Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem. Peer Review Process Based on the reviews, editorial board decides on paper publishing and informs the author within 3 months from paper receipt. Papers should be prepared in accordance with the Instructions for Authors for TTTP. Reviews and publishing. All papers are anonymously reviewed by two anonymous reviewers. On the basis of reviews, editorial staff makes decision on paper publishing and informs the author about it within three months from paper receipt. \u00a0 OPEN ACCESS POLICY In accordance with definition of open access, all content is freely available without charge to the user. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. Traffic and Transport Theory and Practice (TTTP) Journal\u00a0applies the CC BY license. PUBLICATION ETHICS Publication ethics, disclosure policy and malpractice statement \u00a0 Publication and authorship All submitted articles are subject to strict peer-review process by at least two reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular paper. The factors that are taken into account in review are relevance, soundness, significance, originality, readability and language, copyright infringement and plagiarism. For published articles, information on relevant potential conflicts of interest will be made available to the public. \u00a0 Authors’ responsibilities Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work, has not previously been published elsewhere, and the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript. Authors wishing to include figures, tables or other materials that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright holder(s). Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors. Reviewers’ responsibilities Reviewers are required to provide written, competent and unbiased feedback in a timely manner on the scholarly merits and the scientific value of the manuscript. Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author.\u00a0 Reviewers must not have conflict of interest with respect to the research, the authors and\/or the funding sources for the research. If such conflicts exist, the reviewers must report them to the Editor without delay. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor without delay. Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. reviewers must not use unpublished materials disclosed in submitted manuscripts without the express written consent of the authors. The information and ideas presented in submitted manuscripts shall be kept confidential and must not be used for personal gain. Editors’ responsibilities Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject\/accept an article. Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication. Editors should always consider the needs of the authors and the readers when attempting to improve the publication. Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem. \u00a0 Peer Review Process Based on the reviews, editorial board decides on paper publishing and informs the author within 3 months from paper receipt. Papers should be prepared in accordance with the Instructions for Authors for TTTP. Reviews and publishing. All papers are anonymously reviewed by two anonymous reviewers. On the basis of reviews, editorial staff makes decision on paper publishing and informs the author about it within three months from paper receipt. OPEN ACCESS POLICY In accordance with definition of open access, all content is freely available without charge to the user. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search to the full texts of the articles in this journal","og_url":"https:\/\/tttp-au.com\/index.php\/publication-ethics\/","og_site_name":"TTTP Traffic and Transport Theory and Practice Journal","article_modified_time":"2025-01-16T07:31:03+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/tttp-au.com\/index.php\/publication-ethics\/","url":"https:\/\/tttp-au.com\/index.php\/publication-ethics\/","name":"Publication ethics - TTTP Traffic and Transport Theory and Practice Journal","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/tttp-au.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-05-16T13:03:42+00:00","dateModified":"2025-01-16T07:31:03+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/tttp-au.com\/index.php\/publication-ethics\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/tttp-au.com\/index.php\/publication-ethics\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/tttp-au.com\/index.php\/publication-ethics\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/tttp-au.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Publication ethics"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/tttp-au.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/tttp-au.com\/","name":"TTTP Traffic and Transport Theory and Practice Journal","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/tttp-au.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tttp-au.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4015","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tttp-au.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tttp-au.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tttp-au.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tttp-au.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4015"}],"version-history":[{"count":34,"href":"https:\/\/tttp-au.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4015\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4492,"href":"https:\/\/tttp-au.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4015\/revisions\/4492"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tttp-au.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4015"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}